Notes on Relativity:
Not many people realise it, but the theory of Relativity was actually disproved decades ago when the rotation velocities of galaxies was first studied. When galactic rotation curves were first studied it was discovered that they were rotating faster than predicted by the theory of Relativity. They discovered that their galactic observations did not fit with the theory. In science a theory lasts only until evidence is found that contradicts that theory and a new theory is developed, usually building on that previous theory. But when evidence was found that contradicts the theory of Relativity, instead of coming to the proper scientific conclusion that there must be something wrong with the theory, scientists were so blinded by their adoration of Einstein that they instead decided that some 90-99% of the mass in the universe must consist of some sort of exotic, unknown, undetectable type of matter, a type of matter that although it is richly abundant in the universe has never been detected experimentally, nor does anyone know what it is. They called this new type of matter that they had discovered "dark matter", and they have been searching for it ever since, too ridiculously stupid to even comprehend the possibility that Einstein could have been wrong. I've heard of "fudging the figures" before, but 90-99% of the mass in the universe is a hell of a lot of "fudging". Did someone say "dark energy"? Ha ha ha!
The paper "flaw in Relativity" explains exactly what the problem was with the theory of Relativity, and "TimeGravityUniverse" is an entire new theory.
The Economic Crisis:
The first world has become too decadent. The second world is moving up and wants what the first world has, but the global economy cannot cope. Rather than saving the already wealthy from becoming slightly less wealthy, money needs to be invested in the development of the third world as primary producers of food & natural resources. Strike the problem at its source, rather than its outcome. This would result in what I call the "trickle up effect". There are a lot of problems in the third world associated with violence, to keep people happy state owned companies (where possible) that invest the profits back into the local economy would be a good idea. Rather than making a few people wealthy, make a community comfortable. I think you'd find that if the wealthy nations of the world agreed on a percentage of their GDP to be devoted, not to food aid or emergency relief because that is a separate issue, but to the development of the third world, and I'm not talking about loans or investments, even just 1% would make a huge difference, but of course dire circumstances call for extreme measures, it would be much more effective than all of the band-aid solutions being thrown around at the moment. It might take a few years for the effects to begin to become noticeable, but constructing modern agriculture and mining operations etc in third world countries would result in a trickle up effect. Not only does more money invested in the development of third world countries result in better lives for the people living in those countries, but it results in a greater abundance and consequently cheaper prices for the resources that the second world requires to have the luxuries that they desire, and consequently less demand on the higher quality resources for the luxuries that the decadent first world desires. The availability of cheaper resources for luxuries means that more luxuries will be produced, bringing more jobs and greater wealth to the people and nations that produce such luxuries. Cheaper food prices too means that people have more money available to purchase manufactured goods. The problem lies with the fact that there is no longer any demand for the higher quality luxuries that the first world produces since the second world can provide lower quality goods at a much cheaper price. If the price of luxuries could be reduced then the second world could afford to buy a lot of their own goods, thus increasing their market, and the people in the first world could afford to purchase the higher quality goods. At the moment the large proportion of the goods produced in the second world is leading to a situation where goods are no longer in demand from the first world because they are too expensive, soon no one in the first world will have a job and be able to purchase anything from the second world, and the second world will have no one left to buy their goods. Thus by their success the second world have slit their own throats by driving their customers out of business, everything has been outsourced to the second world, and while yes this means that manufactured goods become cheaper, it also means that no one in the first world has jobs any more and they can't buy those goods anyway. Cheaper resources will lead to cheaper goods made by the second world, and the opening up of their domestic markets, cheaper goods made by the first world will mean that less people will be persuaded to buy the cheaper and lower quality products that the second world produces and thus manufacturers will continue to thrive in the first world as they still have people willing to buy their products at a more affordable price. What have you been reading about for the past couple of years? That's right, the rise of China and India. Do you really think that the success of two billion people has nothing to do with the current economic crisis? Anyway, whatever, I'm no economist, but everyone knows that the policy of analy raping the poor has imploded. It's time to build up the poor, because the foundations of the global economy have collapsed under the strain of the emerging economies of the two most populous nations on Earth. There are two billion people climbing the global economic tower, and the higher they climb the more unstable the tower is becoming. You can't stop something collapsing by patching up the top, the foundations need to be strengthened for the structure to remain standing. I guess you guys needed some real motivation in the form of an economic collapse in order for you to help the poor. Zimbabwe & The Democratic Congo might be a good place to start. Or maybe you could just keep throwing money at the big companies and the people at the top of the global economic tower until there's no more money left to throw. So called "stimulus packages" and multibillion dollar bailouts are not going to stop the decline of the global economy, the problem runs much deeper than a few bad bank loans.
Thought I might as well throw in my theory of the Great Pyramid as a perfect mathematical model of the refraction of light in a prism. The Great Pyramid is basically a mathematical model of the Sun. It's not very well written, but like with all my theories, time & gravity, the Universe, sin, God, if you actually bother to read it you will see how amazing it really is. Some of the numbers are absolutely incredible. Just as a quick couple of examples, the dimensions of the Great Pyramid itself are pi, the base is 440cu and the height 280cu, 440/280=pi/2. Also, check out the angle of incidence of the King's Chambers northern and southern "air shafts", they are exactly equal and opposite, when using dimensions to the nearest 0.1cu the difference in angles is 0.006 degrees. The angle of incidence of the Queen's Chamber shafts is very close to zero, with one being 0.31 degrees and the other 0.15 degrees, not as accurate, but pretty close, yeah? Note also the six slabs of granite which form the "weight relief chambers", the six slabs of granite represent the six colours of the electromagnetic spectrum, and when you find the secret to how the model works the light in the theoretical prism would refract over a distance of 29cu, the exact height of the weight relief chambers. Anyway, check it out, but it's not written the greatest. I got my idea after reading a passage in the Egyptian Book of the Dead entitled 'A Hymn Of Praise To Ra When He Riseth In The Eastern Part Of Heaven', check this out, "Thy beams [fall] upon all faces, thy light with its manifold colours is incomprehensible [to man], and thy brilliant rays cannot be reported." Implying that the Ancient Egyptians were aware of the electromagnetic spectrum long before Isaac Newton. PS They didn't need an understanding of trigonometry, they could have gotten all of the dimensions that accurate using Pythagoras' Theorem, of course, Pythagoras hadn't been born at that time. Blah blah blah...
Interested in any of this stuff? You can email me at serious_spears@yahoo.com.au